Weekly Market Commentary
Burt White Chief Investment Officer, LPL Financial
Jeffrey Buchbinder, CFA Market Strategist, LPL Financial
Dividend stocks have been thriving in the low interest rate environment. Dividend-paying stocks, which we define as stocks with higher dividend yields than the broad equity market, have garnered support as investors increasingly use stock dividends as a substitute for fixed income in the low interest rate environment. But has the market’s thirst for yield gone too far? Are these stocks in a bubble? This week we take a look at high-dividend-paying stocks to assess whether these stocks are in a bubble and if investors should actually view high dividend yields as a warning sign.
There are a number of reasons for the increased popularity of high-dividend-paying stocks. First, bond yields are near record lows due to central bank stimulus worldwide and low inflation, leading investors to increasingly favor higher yields offered by equities over bonds—despite the higher volatility that comes with that swap. In fact, the percentage of S&P 500 stocks with dividend yields higher than the 10-year Treasury yield is over 60%, which is the highest it’s been since at least 1970 [Figure 1]. No wonder more investors are turning to equities for yield.
Friday’s slightly weaker than expected jobs report (released on September 2, 2016) will potentially add to the enthusiasm for dividend-paying stocks, as the report may take a September 2016 Federal Reserve (Fed) rate hike off the table (we still expect a Fed rate hike in December after a largely election-related pause at the Fed meeting in early November).
Stocks that pay dividends have also performed better over the long term. Figure 2 separates stocks by dividend policy and shows that stocks that have paid dividends have returned 9.1% annualized since 1972, compared with just 2.5% annualized for non-dividend-paying stocks. Though more scarce, companies that have initiated or grown their dividends have historically performed best, with a 9.9% annualized return over this long period. Companies know that investors like dividends and they deliver them as much as they possibly can.
ARE DIVIDEND PAYERS EXPENSIVE?
Have investors become overly excited about dividend payouts? Perhaps. Figure 3 shows the median price-to-earnings ratio (PE) of high-dividend-paying stocks, at just over 19, has risen well above its more than 40-year average of just over 12.5 (that’s nearly two standard deviations, which is a pretty big margin). That’s expensive. But when comparing the PEs of high-yielding stocks against the broad market, they do not look so expensive—the median PE of the S&P 500 is 24, also well above its long-term average near 16. (Note that because median calculations are not dominated by mega caps, median valuations provide a broader picture of stock valuations than market cap weighted valuation measures, although we believe both valuation measures have merit.)
We have written repeatedly that we believe the equity market is slightly expensive. We have also noted that the popular dividend-paying sector, utilities, is richly valued at a premium to the S&P 500 on a market cap weighted PE basis (11% premium to the S&P 500 as of September 2, 2016). So although we would agree that the market’s thirst for yield has pushed valuations of high-dividend-paying stocks above fair value, it is hard to make the case that they are much more expensive than the stock market as a whole; thus, we do not think these stocks are in a bubble.
In addition, we do not expect high PEs to be a catalyst for a sell-off in high-dividend-paying stocks. Should stocks sell off, especially if accompanied by a rise in interest rates that makes those dividends relatively less attractive when compared with bonds, then we would expect high yielders to suffer as much — if not more than — the broad market. This was the experience during the Fed “taper tantrum” in May and June 2013, which saw interest rates rise sharply, the S&P 500 pull back 6%, and high-yielding stocks lead the way down.
ARE DIVIDEND PAYERS STRETCHED?
How can dividends keep climbing when corporate profits are still stuck in the mud? Dividends for the S&P 500 are growing at a rate of about 5.5% annually, while earnings for the S&P 500 fell 2% year over year in the most recent quarter (second quarter of 2016). Although analysts’ consensus forecasts are for mid-single-digit dividend growth to continue over the next 12 months (according to FactSet data), clearly this pace of growth without profit growth is not sustainable over the long term. Something’s got to give.
The S&P 500’s payout ratio helps show that these dividend payouts are not out of line relative to corporate profits [Figure 4]. In fact, dividend payments as a percentage of profits for the S&P 500 are actually still in-line with the long-term average, after climbing from the depths of the financial crisis. Dividend growth may be limited until companies can generate more profit growth, but payout ratios do not suggest companies are over-distributing (we see a similar story with share repurchases as we discussed in Midyear Outlook 2016 ).
Might profit growth help the dividend picture? If the oil and U.S. dollar drags ease further, corporations should start to generate earnings growth — we expect a potential increase into the mid-single-digits during the fourth quarter of 2016 and hopefully a bit better as 2017 begins. Better economic growth in the U.S. and emerging markets, we believe, may also help give profits a potential lift in coming quarters, which could be accompanied by more dividends.
If dividend growth continues and high-dividend-paying stocks are not all that expensive, should we load up our portfolios with equity income ideas? If suitable, we believe investors should consider reserving a meaningful portion of equity portfolios for stocks that provide the potential for above-average yields, but we continue to favor growth-oriented and less interest rate sensitive areas of the equity market over higher-dividend-paying value stocks, as we continue to expect interest rates to move higher over the balance of 2016 and into next year.
Among equities, we suggest the following for consideration:
Energy/MLPs. Master limited partnerships (MLP) offer very attractive yields (the Alerian MLP Index yield is 7.2%), which can vary depending on the product’s structure. Oil prices have rebounded nicely off of the lows earlier this year and could be buffeted, we believe, by the sharp cuts in oil production in the U.S. and demand growth. The traditional energy sector, which yields a good amount more than the S&P 500 (2.8% versus 2.1%), should benefit if oil prices potentially move back into the $50s over the next several months.
REITs. We believe the economic backdrop is favorable for potential real estate investment trust (REIT) gains. The U.S. economy is growing steadily and creating jobs consistently, but not enough to overheat, in our opinion. Inflation is modest but rising gradually, a favorable condition for cash flow growth of real estate assets. We have not seen signs of overbuilding in the commercial real estate markets, a positive sign for the possible continuation of the real estate cycle.
Pharmaceuticals. The broad healthcare sector offers lower yields than the S&P 500, but the pharmaceutical industry group is yielding 2.5% and has continued to generate solid earnings growth. We expect the Affordable Care Act to remain intact in most election scenarios. Political headlines that have led to the group’s recent underperformance have created long-term value, in our opinion.
Dividend-paying stocks have been thriving in the low interest rate environment as investors increasingly use stock dividends as a substitute for fixed income in the low interest rate environment. Although the market’s thirst for yield has pushed valuations of high-dividend paying stocks above fair value, it is hard to make the case that they are much more expensive than the stock market as a whole; and certainly do not appear bubble-like. And payouts do not look overly stretched. So consider keeping a portion of your portfolios reserved for some dividend-paying stocks, especially those in areas with more favorable growth prospects, and discuss any potential changes with your financial advisor prior to investing. — —
The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.
The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful. Investing in stock includes numerous specific risks including: the fluctuation of dividend, loss of principal, and potential liquidity of the investment in a falling market. The payment of dividends is not guaranteed. Companies may reduce or eliminate the payment of dividends at any given time.
Investing in MLPs involves additional risks as compared to the risks of investing in common stock, including risks related to cash flow, dilution and voting rights. MLPs may trade less frequently than larger companies due to their smaller capitalizations which may result in erratic price movement or difficulty in buying or selling. MLPs are subject to significant regulation and may be adversely affected by changes in the regulatory environment including the risk that an MLP could lose its tax status as a partnership.
Investing in Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) involves special risks such as potential illiquidity and may not be suitable for all investors. There is no assurance that the investment objectives of this program will be attained
Because of its narrow focus, sector investing will be subject to greater volatility than investing more broadly across many sectors and companies. All investing involves risk including loss of principal.
The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.
The Alerian MLP Index is a composite of the 50 most prominent energy Master Limited Partnerships that provides investors with an unbiased, comprehensive benchmark for this emerging asset class. The index, which is calculated using a float-adjusted, capitalization-weighted methodology, is disseminated in real time on a price-return basis (NYSE: AMZ) and on a total-return basis (NYSE: AMZX).
This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.
To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.
RES 5623 0916 | Tracking #1-532455 (Exp. 09/17)
retrieved from: LPL-research.com
Prior Weekly Market Commentaries:
- August 21 2017: TAKING A LITTLE RISK OFF THE TABLE
- August 14 2017: BOTTOM LINE: IMPRESSIVE EARNINGS SEASON
- August 7 2017: BUY THE DIP? WHAT DIP?
- July 31 2017: IS POLICY SKEPTICISM CREATING A SMALL CAP OPPORTUNITY?
- July 24 2017: TAX REFORM PIVOT?
- July 17 2017: GLOBAL SUMMER EARNINGS: SIZZLE OR FIZZLE?
- July 10 2017: SECOND QUARTER 2017 EARNINGS PREVIEW: Q1 A TOUGH ACT TO FOLLOW
- June 26 2017: A TECHNICAL CHECK-IN: THE GLOBAL BULL LOOKS STRONG
- June 19 2017: MIDYEAR OUTLOOK 2017: BUSINESS FUNDAMENTALS BACK AT THE CONTROLS
- June 12 2017: HURDLING OVERSEAS EARNINGS-WHAT DO THE FORECASTS TELL US?
- June 5 2017: MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MORE GOING ON THAN OIL PRICE
- May 30 2017: CORPORATE BEIGE BOOK: IT KEEPS GETTING BETTER
- May 22 2017: FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
- May 15 2017: EARNINGS UPDATE: RAISING THE BAR
- May 8 2017: FIVE REASONS NOT TO SELL IN MAY
- May 1 2017: REFLECTING ON NASDAQ 6,000
- April 24 2017: EUROPE ENTERS THE TOUR DE FRANCE
- April 17 2017: WHICH BREAKS FIRST, STOCK PRICES OR UNCERTAINTY?
- April 10 2017: FIRST QUARTER 2017 EARNINGS PREVIEW: DOUBLE DIGITS?
- April 3 2017: CHECKING IN ON SOME TRUMP TRADES
- March 27 2017: THE STOCK MARKET’S FINAL FOUR FACTORS
- March 20 2017: WILL THIS SIXTEEN BE SWEET?
- March 13 2017: HOW MUCH IS LEFT IN THE TANK?
- March 6 2017: CORPORATE BEIGE BOOK: BETTER SENTIMENT AND LOTS OF TAX TALK
- February 27 2017: TIPTOE THROUGH THE TULIPS AND OTHER EUROPEAN OFFERINGS
- February 21 2017: EARNINGS UPDATE: FIVE OBSERVATIONS
- February 13 2017: REAL ESTATE OVERVIEW: ALL ABOUT THE CYCLES
- February 6 2017: TAKING STOCK OF TECHNICALS AND SENTIMENT
- January 30 2017: IS THERE STILL VALUE IN VALUE?
- January 23 2017: INTERNATIONAL STOCKS WE LOOK EAST TO JAPAN
- January 17 2017: IS SMALL CAP STRENGTH SUSTAINABLE?
- January 9 2017: FOURTH QUARTER 2016 EARNINGS PREVIEW: LOOKS LIKE ANOTHER GOOD ONE
- January 3 2017: 2017 STOCK MARKET OUTLOOK: GEARS ARE TURNING, BUT PARTS MAY NEED GREASE
- December 19 2016: A LOOK BACK AT 2016 HITS AND MISSES
- December 12 2016: CAN’T STOCKS AND BOND YIELDS JUST GET ALONG?
- December 5 2016: IRRATIONAL EXUBERANCE PART TWO?
- November 28 2016: CORPORATE BEIGE BOOK: BETTER TONE, LITTLE ELECTION TALK
- November 21 2016: HOLIDAY SHOPPING PREVIEW
- November 14 2016: WHAT A WEEK
- November 7 2016: EARNINGS UPDATE: END OF A LONG DROUGHT
- October 31 2016: HALLOWEEN SPECIAL: WHAT MIGHT SCARE MARKETS
- October 24 2016: ELECTION PLAYBOOK
- October 17 2016: TAKING STOCK OF TECHNICALS AND SENTIMENT
- October 10 2016: THIRD QUARTER 2016 EARNINGS PREVIEW: GROWTH RETURNS?
- October 3 2016: WELCOME TO THE FOURTH QUARTER
- September 26 2016: FIVE FORECASTERS: FEW WARNING SIGNS
- September 19 2016: EM EARNINGS: BEGINNING TO EMERGE
- September 12 2016: SELL NOW?
- September 6 2016: DIVIDEND BUBBLE?
- August 29 2016: CORPORATE BEIGE BOOK: Q2 OFFERS FEW SIGNS OF IMPROVEMENT
- August 22 2016: WHAT THE MARKET IS TELLING US ABOUT THE ELECTION
- August 15 2016: OVERSEEING POOR EARNINGS OVERSEAS
- August 8 2016: EARNINGS UPDATE: WE WERE HOPING FOR MORE
- August 1 2016: TIME FOR AN AUGUST SWOON?