Weekly Market Commentary
BREXIT: SHOULD THEY STAY OR SHOULD THEY GO?
June 23, the day the United Kingdom votes on whether to remain in the European Union, is circled on every calendar on every trading desk globally. The vote will likely be very close, and while the most recent opinion polls show the likelihood of a “leave” vote increasing, though with a margin of error and a sizable undecided vote, the outcome is still unknown. Financial markets had been pricing in the U.K. remaining. However, as the polls have tightened, we see an increasing probability of a Brexit reflected primarily in the relative weakness of the British pound, but also in British stocks, particularly in the financial sector. Should the U.K. vote to leave the EU, a multi-year process to negotiate the details will take place. The financial market implication will be more immediate, and could be negative for a wide variety of financial assets until the markets obtain a better understanding of what really will happen as a result.
WILL THEY STAY OR WILL THEY GO?
The British rock band The Clash’s hit “Should I Stay or Should I Go?” is #228 on Rolling Stone’s list of greatest rock songs. It’s a short, simple song about the inability to decide whether to stay in a relationship or leave it behind. The questions are practical, not emotional. It’s a good metaphor for the Brexit question. To be sure, there are emotional issues tied to the Brexit decision, especially regarding immigration and what is widely considered an unacceptable loss of sovereignty to the European bureaucracy, often simply referred to as Brussels. These issues are hard to quantify, both in how they shape the political environment and how changes in that environment will ultimately impact policy.
WHAT’S THE PROCESS?
On the other hand, we can make some reasonable estimates on the impact of the upcoming vote, regardless of the nal outcome. Polling data suggest that the vote will be very close [Figure 1], with some very recent polls showing an increase in the leave vote. However, as polls in the U.K. have been unreliable, traders and financial participants have been using other sources to gauge public opinion, notably betting—it is legal to bet on political events in the U.K. Around 10–20% of people are still undecided according to polls, which is increasing the uncertainty surrounding the outcome.
To evaluate the potential stock market impact of a Brexit, we must make certain assumptions about the near term. Proponents of the Brexit suggest that leaving the EU would be good for the U.K. They note that Brussels saddles U.K. companies with thousands of pages of rules covering the minutia of commerce. Some examples of those causing the most outrage are rules governing the curvature of bananas and a proposal to sell eggs by weight, rather than a set price per dozen. It is quite possible that there may be a long-term, positive impact for the U.K. if it leaves the EU. But in the near term, we believe it is safe to assume the Brexit would cause an initial sharp decline in the pound against the euro, and that both would decline relative to the U.S. dollar, Chinese yuan, Japanese yen, and other major global currencies. We also would expect a decline across almost all global equity markets, simply on the economic uncertainty created.
IF I GO THERE WILL BE TROUBLE …
What is the potential impact on the markets in the event of a Brexit? To help answer this question, we ran a scenario analysis assuming that the British pound would decline 10% following a Brexit vote. We used a model that examined the historical relationship between stocks in various indexes and how they were correlated to a move in currency. This sort of model has limitations; there are always multiple factors that move stocks. When viewing events that are by definition extreme, we are assuming, reasonably, that the event will be a dominant factor in the performance of the stock.
The objective of this analysis is not to pinpoint exact potential stock market gains or losses, but rather to assess the approximate magnitude of the movement and what segments of the market are more likely to have an extreme reaction.
Although we normally think about this sort of currency volatility with respect to emerging, not developed, market currencies, it does not seem out of place in this context. On Friday, June 10, 2016, the pound fell 1.4% just on the announcement of a new poll favoring a Brexit. Based on historical relationships, this scenario suggests a decline of 4.6% for European stocks overall (measured by the EuroStoxx 600 Index), with a decline of as much as11% in British stocks (measured by the British stocks in the MSCI All-Cap World Index). The analysis also suggests that the mining, energy, and financial services sectors would be hardest hit in all countries, but especially the companies in those industries within the U.K. Under this same scenario, we would expect an approximate 3% decline in U.S. stocks (per S&P 500 Index), with relative weakness in the same sectors as in Europe: energy, mining and financial stocks. Keep in mind that this is a hypothetical scenario analysis and is not a guarantee of future performance. Actual results will vary.
IF I STAY IT WILL BE DOUBLE
Some segments of the market, particularly of the U.K. stock market, are more vulnerable than others. Larger U.K. stocks receive most of their revenue from outside the country (between 70–80%), whereas smaller stocks, represented by the FTSE 250, get less than 50% from outside the country. At first, this seems like an odd detail. But if you look at the largest stocks in the market, you see many global banks, mining, and energy companies. These companies may be based in the U.K., but they do business and, in the case of commodity companies, have most of their physical assets outside the country. Overall, it is estimated that across FTSE 100 companies, 55% of their total assets are held outside of the U.K.
Therefore, it can be argued that many large U.K. companies are British in official corporate domicile only. They are in fact global companies, especially those involved in finance and commodity production.
Those sectors alone account for roughly 50% of U.K. market capitalization. The thought of the U.K. being less integrated in the global economy is one reason these companies are so sensitive to the Brexit vote. Those companies that actually manufacture in the U.K. and export goods would gain some benefit from a weaker pound. But a British mining company with mines in Australia and South Africa could expect no such benefit, although non-British shareholders still suffer the loss on their holdings. More than half of all the shares of British companies are held by foreign investors.
DON’T YOU KNOW WHICH CLOTHES EVEN FIT ME?
Financial services are the poster child for the issues regarding the Brexit. Financial stocks throughout the EU have been negatively impacted by the possibility of the U.K. leaving; London is either the corporate headquarters or the European hub for about half of all the world’s biggest financial services companies. This uncertainty, and the possibility of loss of access to markets, may cause European financials to significantly underperform the broader European markets [Figure 2]. Financials also bring into focus some of the complicated issues regarding regulation, especially the belief that the EU overregulates industries and doesn’t know which rules really fit which institutions. But most large financial firms are global; therefore, British companies operating in Europe will be required to comply with EU law, regardless of whether the vote is for or against a Brexit.
A major issue is referred to as “passporting,” the series of rules that allow financial firms to provide services in a country without having a physical presence in that country. If the U.K. leaves the EU, U.K. banks’ passporting rights would likely have to be renegotiated; in addition, non-European banks that have access to the entire EU by maintaining a physical presence in London might lose this ability as well. The potential loss of passporting rights is a major concern for global financials.
The European Commission is in the process of revising many rules regarding the sale of financial service products under the unwieldy name Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID 2). Every institution seeking to do business in Europe will be required to comply with this new directive, regardless of their country of domicile and membership in the EU.
There is a great deal of uncertainty regarding both the outcome of the Brexit vote and the long-term impact of the U.K. leaving the EU. Regardless of the ultimate outcome, financial markets hate uncertainty; we can see this in the relative weakness of the British pound. The markets are also concerned that the U.K. leaving would strengthen independence movements in Scotland, the Basque region of Spain, and similar movements across the continent. Financial stocks are likely to be most impacted by a Brexit; they would suffer all the economic uncertainty but would receive neither regulatory relief nor the benefit of a weaker currency. Financials in Europe have underperformed significantly recently as a result. We expect that energy and mining stocks would also suffer should the U.K. vote to leave. — —
With apologies to Joe Strummer and Mick Jones.
The opinions voiced in this material are for general information only and are not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. To determine which investment(s) may be appropriate for you, consult your financial advisor prior to investing. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results.
The economic forecasts set forth in the presentation may not develop as predicted and there can be no guarantee that strategies promoted will be successful.
Investing in stock includes numerous specific risks including: the fluctuation of dividend, loss of principal, and potential liquidity of the investment in a falling market.
International investing involves special risks such as currency fluctuation and political instability and may not be suitable for all investors. These risks are often heightened for investments in emerging markets.
The fast price swings in commodities and currencies will result in significant volatility in an investor’s holdings. All investing involves risk including loss of principal.
The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.
The STOXX Europe 600 Index is derived from the STOXX Europe Total Market Index (TMI) and is a subset of the STOXX Global 1800 Index. With a fixed number of 600 components, the STOXX Europe 600 Index represents large, mid, and small capitalization companies across 18 countries of the European region: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
The EuroStoxx 600 Banks is a subset of the EuroStoxx 600 Index of banking stocks, there are 47 constituents in this index.
The MSCI All Country World Index is an unmanaged, free-float-adjusted, market capitalization-weighted index composed of stocks of companies located in countries throughout the world. It is designed to measure equity market performance in global developed and emerging markets. The index includes reinvestment of dividends, net of foreign withholding taxes.
The FTSE 250 Index is a capitalization-weighted index consisting of the 101st to the 350th largest companies listed on the London Stock Exchange. The FTSE 100 is a subset, comprised of the 100 largest companies traded on the London Stock Exchange.
This research material has been prepared by LPL Financial.
To the extent you are receiving investment advice from a separately registered independent investment advisor, please note that LPL Financial is not an affiliate of and makes no representation with respect to such entity.
RES 5518 0616 | Tracking #1-506307 (Exp. 06/17)
retrieved from: LPL-research.com
Prior Weekly Market Commentaries:
- October 16 2017: THE 1987 CRASH: A NOT SO HAPPY ANNIVERSARY
- October 9 2017: THIRD QUARTER 2017 EARNINGS PREVIEW: SLOWER BUT STILL SOLID
- October 2 2017: MARKETS BUYING INTO TAX REFORM
- September 25 2017: THE BULL MARKET APPEARS ALIVE AND WELL
- September 18 2017: UPDATE ON GROWTH AND VALUE STOCKS
- September 11 2017: STRONG EUROPEAN EARNINGS ARE KEEPING EUROPE CHEAP
- September 5 2017: PUTTING THE NORTH KOREAN THREAT INTO PERSPECTIVE
- August 28 2017: CORPORATE BEIGE BOOK: UPBEAT AS EXPECTED
- August 21 2017: TAKING A LITTLE RISK OFF THE TABLE
- August 14 2017: BOTTOM LINE: IMPRESSIVE EARNINGS SEASON
- August 7 2017: BUY THE DIP? WHAT DIP?
- July 31 2017: IS POLICY SKEPTICISM CREATING A SMALL CAP OPPORTUNITY?
- July 24 2017: TAX REFORM PIVOT?
- July 17 2017: GLOBAL SUMMER EARNINGS: SIZZLE OR FIZZLE?
- July 10 2017: SECOND QUARTER 2017 EARNINGS PREVIEW: Q1 A TOUGH ACT TO FOLLOW
- June 26 2017: A TECHNICAL CHECK-IN: THE GLOBAL BULL LOOKS STRONG
- June 19 2017: MIDYEAR OUTLOOK 2017: BUSINESS FUNDAMENTALS BACK AT THE CONTROLS
- June 12 2017: HURDLING OVERSEAS EARNINGS-WHAT DO THE FORECASTS TELL US?
- June 5 2017: MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MORE GOING ON THAN OIL PRICE
- May 30 2017: CORPORATE BEIGE BOOK: IT KEEPS GETTING BETTER
- May 22 2017: FOCUS ON FUNDAMENTALS
- May 15 2017: EARNINGS UPDATE: RAISING THE BAR
- May 8 2017: FIVE REASONS NOT TO SELL IN MAY
- May 1 2017: REFLECTING ON NASDAQ 6,000
- April 24 2017: EUROPE ENTERS THE TOUR DE FRANCE
- April 17 2017: WHICH BREAKS FIRST, STOCK PRICES OR UNCERTAINTY?
- April 10 2017: FIRST QUARTER 2017 EARNINGS PREVIEW: DOUBLE DIGITS?
- April 3 2017: CHECKING IN ON SOME TRUMP TRADES
- March 27 2017: THE STOCK MARKET’S FINAL FOUR FACTORS
- March 20 2017: WILL THIS SIXTEEN BE SWEET?
- March 13 2017: HOW MUCH IS LEFT IN THE TANK?
- March 6 2017: CORPORATE BEIGE BOOK: BETTER SENTIMENT AND LOTS OF TAX TALK
- February 27 2017: TIPTOE THROUGH THE TULIPS AND OTHER EUROPEAN OFFERINGS
- February 21 2017: EARNINGS UPDATE: FIVE OBSERVATIONS
- February 13 2017: REAL ESTATE OVERVIEW: ALL ABOUT THE CYCLES
- February 6 2017: TAKING STOCK OF TECHNICALS AND SENTIMENT
- January 30 2017: IS THERE STILL VALUE IN VALUE?
- January 23 2017: INTERNATIONAL STOCKS WE LOOK EAST TO JAPAN
- January 17 2017: IS SMALL CAP STRENGTH SUSTAINABLE?
- January 9 2017: FOURTH QUARTER 2016 EARNINGS PREVIEW: LOOKS LIKE ANOTHER GOOD ONE
- January 3 2017: 2017 STOCK MARKET OUTLOOK: GEARS ARE TURNING, BUT PARTS MAY NEED GREASE
- December 19 2016: A LOOK BACK AT 2016 HITS AND MISSES
- December 12 2016: CAN’T STOCKS AND BOND YIELDS JUST GET ALONG?
- December 5 2016: IRRATIONAL EXUBERANCE PART TWO?
- November 28 2016: CORPORATE BEIGE BOOK: BETTER TONE, LITTLE ELECTION TALK
- November 21 2016: HOLIDAY SHOPPING PREVIEW
- November 14 2016: WHAT A WEEK
- November 7 2016: EARNINGS UPDATE: END OF A LONG DROUGHT
- October 31 2016: HALLOWEEN SPECIAL: WHAT MIGHT SCARE MARKETS
- October 24 2016: ELECTION PLAYBOOK
- October 17 2016: TAKING STOCK OF TECHNICALS AND SENTIMENT
- October 10 2016: THIRD QUARTER 2016 EARNINGS PREVIEW: GROWTH RETURNS?
- October 3 2016: WELCOME TO THE FOURTH QUARTER